Empire State convinces, but Liberation Peak and Iberian Offensive generate some doubts.
More stories in the category News
- Rumor: Battlefield 6 could last years, but EA is already thinking of an annual model for the saga, in COD style
- The Chinese RPG Gujian 4: Swords of Legends will be released on Xbox
- You can now install Delta Force ahead of time on Xbox, make plenty of room on your SSD
| Don't miss anything and follow us on Google News! |
The second beta of Battlefield 6 has served for players to try out firsthand several of the scenarios that will be present in the final game. Beyond technical performance, what has really generated debate is how these maps feel in the heat of combat and what they offer in terms of pace and gameplay.
Although impressions are varied, the truth is that all the maps have interesting points, either because of their setting, the type of confrontations they propose, or the strategic possibilities they allow.
Battlefield 6 Maps: Empire State, Iberian Offensive, and Liberation Peak
- One of the most commented maps has been Iberian Offensive. With an urban design full of buildings and destructible elements, it offers a chaotic and intense environment in each confrontation. It’s true that some players point out that it can be somewhat linear in certain phases, but at the same time, it provides close and direct battles that fit with those seeking constant action. Visually, the use of filters gives the scenario a particular look that divides opinions, although it undoubtedly gives it its own identity compared to the rest.
- On the other hand, Liberation Peak bets on a very dynamic approach, with fast-paced confrontations that lead to action almost immediately. This intensity can be exhausting in long sessions, but at the same time, it ensures that the player doesn’t have downtime. The anti-aircraft guns at the capture points, for example, show an interesting balance: they do a lot of damage, which forces you to use them with caution. It’s a map that could gain even more with small adjustments in the breadth of combat zones.
- The one that has received the most praise so far is Empire State. In Conquest mode, it combines chaos and strategy with quite a bit of success, offering differentiated capture areas that allow for different routes and tactics. Although it’s an intense map with a lot of movement, it also leaves space for those who prefer to organize before launching into capture. That said, in Assault mode, it becomes a much more chaotic experience, clearly designed for those who enjoy non-stop action.
Pros and Cons of Battlefield 6 Maps
| Map | Pros | Cons (Possible Adjustments) |
|---|---|---|
| Iberian Offensive | — Urban environment with a high level of destruction. — Constant intensity in each combat. — Closed scenarios ideal for direct action. |
— Somewhat linear flow in certain areas. — The visual filter can be dull for some players. |
| Liberation Peak | — Very dynamic pace, almost immediate action. — Maps designed for intense and fast combat. |
— Combat zones are somewhat narrow. — Long sessions can feel exhausting due to high intensity. |
| Empire State | — Good balance between chaos and strategy. — Differentiated capture points, favoring different tactics. — In Conquest, it offers room for planning. |
— In Assault, it can become excessively chaotic. — Less space for paused strategies in that mode. |
Battlefield 6 will be released in October 2025 on Xbox Series, PS5, and PC, and this test leaves us with the impression that DICE has solid material to recover the essence of the saga in the new generation.
Lover of videogames, Xbox, Halo and Gears of War.
Related Post
